Upcoming Talks for Jeroen van Craenenbroeck
In the following months, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck will give talks at GLOW 38, DiGS 17, Formal ways of analysing variation 2 and CGSW 30.
In the following months, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck will give talks at GLOW 38, DiGS 17, Formal ways of analysing variation 2 and CGSW 30.
The schedule for the Sprouse Lectures has changed; check the lectures page for up to date information.
CRISSP is happy to announce a CRISSP Lecture Series with Jon Sprouse (University of Connecticut) on March 16-18, 2015. The title of the Lecture Series is ‘A program for experimental syntax: data, theory, and biology’.
CRISSP (KU Leuven) and UiL OTS (Universiteit Utrecht), as part of the joint NWO/FWO project ‘The Syntax of Idioms’, are proud to present the 8th Brussels Conference on Generative Linguistics: The grammar of idioms. Workshop description According to the Fregean principle of compositionality, the meaning of a complex expression is determined by the meanings of […]
In 2014, CRISSP organized the 37th GLOW colloquium. The videos of the talks are now available at http://www.glow37.org/videos/.
CRISSP members Jolijn Sonnaert, Tanja Temmerman and Will Harwood will give talks at the TIN-dag in Utrecht tomorrow.
Jeroen van Craenenbroeck will give an invited research seminar talk at the Institut national des langues et civilisations orientales (Paris, France) on February 6, 2015. The title of the talk is ‘Quantity and quality in linguistic variation: the case of verb clusters’.
CRISSP (KU Leuven) and UiL OTS (Universiteit Utrecht), as part of the joint NWO/FWO project ‘The Syntax of Idioms’, are proud to present the 8th Brussels Conference on Generative Linguistics: The grammar of idioms.
The LNAT3 programme is now online and can be consulted at https://www.crissp.be/lnat3.
The topic of LNAT3 is ‘The semantics and pragmatics of logical constants’ and the conference will take place on February 5-6.
Numerals raise a host of linguistic issues of a syntactic, morphological, and semantic nature. From a syntactic point of view, they sit on the divide between lexical and functional categories, and occupy a fixed position in the extended nominal projection. Morphologically, they often constitute a productive and fairly transparent category, but their categorial status remains […]