CRISSP is happy to announce another installment in the CRISSP Lecture Series:
Category Archives: CRISSP Lecture Series
The Merlo Lectures
CRISSP is happy to announce another installment in the CRISSP Lecture Series:
The Biberauer lectures
CRISSP is happy to announce another installment in the CRISSP Lecture Series:
Sabine Iatridou and Jan-Wouter Zwart at CRISSP
Sabine Iatridou will give a lecture series on tense and aspect on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. Also on Friday, Jan-Wouter Zwart will give a seminar entitled ‘Periphrastic morphology, verb clusters, and verb movement’.
> The Iatridou Lectures: Fancy Games with Tense and Aspect
> CRISSP Seminar with Jan-Wouter Zwart: Periphrastic morphology, verb clusters, and verb movement
The Iatridou Lectures: Title and Abstract
The title and the abstract for the Iatridou Lectures are now available:
Title: Fancy Games with Tense and Aspect
Abstract: Read the abstract (PDF)
The Lecture Series will take place on May 25, 26 and 27.
New CRISSP Events: Save the date
CRISSP is very happy to present five new events in the following months.
- CRISSP Seminar with Luis Vicente: February 22, 2016
- Public Defence Koen Roelandt: March 31, 2016
- Krow Fest with Louise McNally, Chris Barker and Rick Nouwen: April 1, 2016
- The Iatridou Lectures: May 25-27, 2016
- CRISSP Seminar with Jan-Wouter Zwart: May 27, 2016
The Barker Lectures: Continuations and Natural Language
CRISSP is happy to announce a CRISSP Lecture Series with Chris Barker on October 14-16, 2015. The title of the Lecture Series is ‘Continuations and Natural Language’.
Abstract
Scope-taking is a hallmark of natural language: not only is it widespread in the world’s languages, it is pervasive within individual languages. It is so familiar to us linguists that it is sometimes hard to appreciate just how astonishing it is for an expression to take material that surrounds it as its semantic argument. For instance, in “Ann gave everyone cookies”, the semantic argument of the quantificational DP “everyone” is the property constructed by abstracting over the direct object position, i.e., “\x.Ann gave x cookies”. Clearly, a deep and complete understanding of scope-taking is of foundational importance. Building on joint work with Chung-chieh Shan, I will bring to bear insights and techniques from the theory of programming languages, in particular, the concept of a CONTINUATION. One potential advantage of continuations over other approaches is that continuations allow fine-grained control over the order of evaluation. This allows a new account of sensitivity to linear order in weak crossover, reconstruction, negative polarity licensing, and dynamic anaphora. I will go on to explain how continuations allow understanding the traditional method of Quantifier Raising not as an ad-hoc heuristic for constructing so-called “logical forms”, but as a bone fide logical inference rule in the context of a substructural logic. This will lead to an account of parasitic scope and recursive scope, as in adjectives such as “same” and “different”, as well as of sluicing as a kind of anaphora, including accounts of sprouting examples (“Ann left, but I don’t know when”) and Andrews Amalgams (“Ann ate I don’t know what yesterday”).
New CRISSP Seminars and Lecture Series
We are happy to announce new CRISSP Seminars and Lecture Series:
- CRISSP Seminar with Andrew Nevins: October 9, 2015
- Lecture Series with Chris Barker: October 14-16, 2015
- CRISSP Seminar with Marcel den Dikken: January 26, 2016
The Sprouse Lectures: new schedule
The schedule for the Sprouse Lectures has changed; check the lectures page for up to date information.
The Sprouse Lectures: A program for experimental syntax: data, theory, and biology
CRISSP is happy to announce a CRISSP Lecture Series with Jon Sprouse (University of Connecticut) on March 16-18, 2015. The title of the Lecture Series is ‘A program for experimental syntax: data, theory, and biology’.
Abstract
Over the past 15 years or so, the use of formal experimental methods has steadily gained popularity in theoretical linguistics. The question I’d like to address in this series is exacly how these methods can further the goals of syntactic theory. To that end, I will attempt to lay out a comprehensive research agenda that highlights the types of questions that I think formal methods are particularly well-suited to address. I will divide these questions into three types, roughly corresponding to each day of the lecture series: (i) questions about the data underlying syntactic theories (data), (ii) questions about the nature of syntactic theories (theory), and finally (iii) questions about the mentalistic consequences of syntactic theories (biology). For each topic, I will present a mix of old and new case studies, primarily based on acceptability judgment experiments, with at least one EEG experiment and one computational model thrown in for good measure. My hope is that these case studies will stimulate discussion about how we can push each of these research threads even further in the future.